A quick comparison between AAC blocks vs clay bricks
AAC blocks are a relatively new phenomenon in Indian construction industry. Although first AAC blocks plant in India was set up in early 1970s by Siporex at Pune, it is only recently that manufacturing and usage of AAC blocks has reached sizeable number. Inspite of drastic growth in manufacturing of AAC products, fact is that market share of AAC products is very small compared to red clay bricks. There are various reasons for this, but that is a topic for another post. In current post we have provided a comparison between AAC blocks vs clay bricks and we let you be the judge for selecting the best product to suit your needs.
Zero soil consumption. Primary raw material for AAC blocks is fly ash. This fly ash is industrial waste generated by coal-based thermal power plants.
One sq ft of carpet area with clay brick walling will consume 25.5 kg of top soil.
One sq ft of carpet area with AAC blocks will consume 1 kg of coal.
One sq ft of carpet area with clay bricks will consume 8 kg of coal.
One sq ft of carpet area will emit 2.2 kg of CO2.
One sq ft of carpet area will emit 17.6 kg of CO2.
Organized sector with proper HR practices.
Unorganized sector with rampant use of child labour.
State-of-the-art factory facility.
Unhealthy working conditions due to toxic gases.
Contributes to government taxes in form of Central Excise, VAT and Octroi.
Does not contribute to government exchequer.
600 / 625 mm x 200 / 240 mm x 100-300 mm
225 mm x 100 mm x 65 mm
Variation in Size
1.5 mm (+/-)
5 mm (+/-)
1800 kg/ m3
Fire Resistance (8″ wall)
Up to 7 hours.
Around 2 hours
Reduction in dead weight leading to savings in steel and concrete.
Approximately 30% for heating and cooling.
We hope this information helps settle AAC blocks vs clay bricks debate. 🙂
P.S: AAC blocks are also called Siporex blocks or Aerocon blocks in various areas.